The fluent community includes Fluent Bit, Fluentd, and the Fluent Operator

Fluent Community

Hey, I'm currently trying to integrate the fluent-operator in multi tenant environment, a PR is upcoming for 2 minor fixes. But there is a more general question about the operator design. Personally I'd like to implement a validating webhook to deal with breaking configuration. IMHO this is actually impossible to do so, as the configuration is set up incrementally. For example once you apply a `Filter`  containing new `Parser`  definition, it depends on the apply order to make it work. An option could be to have an actual non-dynamic FluentBitConfig or lets call it `Flow` referencing all the filters, parsers, outputs directly so that you can make sure the change is atomic and consistent. An alternative would be copy the dry-run status of all related `FluentBitConfig` and the `ClusterFluentBitConfig` .

To get it right, I don't want to drop all the individual crds like filter and parser. This is also quite nice. Logging operator had similar difficulties and handled it like proposed having a separate flow resource.

<https://axoflow.com/multi-tenancy-using-logging-operator/>

I prefer to use the fluent-operator in order to get use fluent-bit directly, that's why i'm asking and not using logging operator at all.