A complete solution for open data platforms, enterprise data catalogs, data lakes and data management. Open source, mature, fully-featured and production ready.

DataHub

I tried adding a glossary here <https://demo.datahubproject.io/dataset/urn:li:dataset:(urn:li:dataPlatform:snowflake,profiling_tests.test_schema.t4,PROD)/Schema?is_lineage_mode=false|https://demo.datahubproject.io/dataset/urn:li:dataset:(urn:li:dataPlatform:snowflake,pro[…]g_tests.test_schema.t4,PROD)/Schema?is_lineage_mode=false> and searched for the term <https://demo.datahubproject.io/search?filter_entity=DATASET&amp;page=1&amp;query=Sensitive>. Seems it is not happening currently

I tried <https://demo.datahubproject.io/search?filter_glossaryTerms=urn%3Ali%3AglossaryTerm%3AClassification.Sensitive&amp;page=1&amp;query=%2A> to filter for Sensitive glossary. It seems like it is being filtered where the term is on dataset instead of dataset fields.

Seems like currently column glossary is not being included in search results

<@U01NN9CTQ01> It seems we are not returning match insights for glossary terms attached to fields. Would this be an easy fix?

Should be an easy fix. We don’t have this for tags either. Note, we won’t be able to show the field that contains the tag/term, we can only show the tag/term itself

There is a backlog item to refactor how this highlight is generated. We should tackle that problem there. In the meantime, let me add fieldtags and fieldterms

Maybe I'm not understanding the use case here... you can explicitly filter for `fieldGlossaryTerms:Term` in the search to find those glossary terms attached to fields

Or for editedFieldGlossaryTerms (changed via UI):
```editedFieldGlossaryTerms:AccountBalance```