Hey, I've noticed that LookML ingestion plugin doe...
# ingestion
r
Hey, I've noticed that LookML ingestion plugin doesn't parse includes in a recursive manner, and because of that, some views might not be ingested. Should I create a github issue for it?
👀 1
m
Please do! /cc @high-hospital-85984 @orange-airplane-6566 who are experts in lookml
thankyou 1
👌 1
r
https://github.com/linkedin/datahub/issues/3239 here is the issue. Sorry for the delay 🙏
m
@rhythmic-london-44496: Thanks! Were you thinking of working on it?
r
Yeah, I can work on it, I will try to come up with something in a week or two 👍
@high-hospital-85984 @orange-airplane-6566 here is the draft of a fix -> https://github.com/linkedin/datahub/pull/3248/files I've should probably introduce a check in order to discover circular dependencies. Should I continue placing this code there or do you think it would be better to reorganize the code? I wonder how we can improve ingesting the views. Right now a lot of information seems to be lost and it's hard to map what's in datahub with what's in Looker. What about Looker explores?
m
@rhythmic-london-44496 we have some improvements coming there. PR should be coming today!
🙌 1