Hey guys, after upgrading from v0.8.43 to v0.8.44 i'm not able to run ingest via UI anymore, getting the same message for any recipe:

~~~~ Execution Summary ~~~~

RUN_INGEST - {'errors': [],
 'exec_id': '6162dff1-1fc1-49a9-8e04-1b5519458091',
 'infos': ['2022-09-05 22:16:28.588080 [exec_id=6162dff1-1fc1-49a9-8e04-1b5519458091] INFO: Starting execution for task with name=RUN_INGEST',
           '2022-09-05 22:16:28.588763 [exec_id=6162dff1-1fc1-49a9-8e04-1b5519458091] INFO: Caught exception EXECUTING '
           'task_id=6162dff1-1fc1-49a9-8e04-1b5519458091, name=RUN_INGEST, stacktrace=Traceback (most recent call last):\n'
           '  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/acryl/executor/execution/default_executor.py", line 121, in execute_task\n'
           '    self.event_loop.run_until_complete(task_future)\n'
           '  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/nest_asyncio.py", line 89, in run_until_complete\n'
           '    return f.result()\n'
           '  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/asyncio/futures.py", line 201, in result\n'
           '    raise self._exception\n'
           '  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/asyncio/tasks.py", line 256, in __step\n'
           '    result = coro.send(None)\n'
           '  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/acryl/executor/execution/sub_process_ingestion_task.py", line 71, in execute\n'
           '    validated_args = SubProcessIngestionTaskArgs.parse_obj(args)\n'
           '  File "pydantic/main.py", line 521, in pydantic.main.BaseModel.parse_obj\n'
           '  File "pydantic/main.py", line 341, in pydantic.main.BaseModel.__init__\n'
           'pydantic.error_wrappers.ValidationError: 1 validation error for SubProcessIngestionTaskArgs\n'
           'debug_mode\n'
           '  extra fields not permitted (type=value_error.extra)\n']}
Execution finished with errors.

I tried to recreate the recipe using the UI, but i'm getting the same error. Any thoughts? PS: I'm using datahub-helm (v0.2.93) and ingestion is handled by datahub-actions (v0.0.4)

Hi Pedro, Thanks for you share the solution. I'am getting the same issue with you and solved it with your method. 👍