Hi guys, I’m trying to run `start:mock` for web-ui...
# troubleshoot
f
Hi guys, I’m trying to run
start:mock
for web-ui but I face to this issue. Any glues?
Copy code
validate.mjs:87 Uncaught Error: Unknown type "UpdateLineageInput". Did you mean "UpdateNameInput", "UpdateViewInput", "LineageInput", "UpdateEmbedInput", or "UpdateMediaInput"?

Unknown type "EntityPrivileges". Did you mean "Privileges"?

Unknown type "EntityPrivileges". Did you mean "Privileges"?

Unknown type "EntityPrivileges". Did you mean "Privileges"?

Unknown type "EntityPrivileges". Did you mean "Privileges"?

Unknown type "EntityPrivileges". Did you mean "Privileges"?

Unknown type "EntityPrivileges". Did you mean "Privileges"?
    at assertValidSDL (validate.mjs:87:1)
    at buildASTSchema (buildASTSchema.mjs:29:1)
    at Module.<anonymous> (schema.ts:14:1)
    at ./src/graphql-mock/schema.ts (schema.ts:15:1)
    at __webpack_require__ (bootstrap:856:1)
    at fn (bootstrap:150:1)
    at Module.<anonymous> (schema.ts:15:1)
    at ./src/graphql-mock/server.ts (server.ts:84:1)
    at __webpack_require__ (bootstrap:856:1)
    at fn (bootstrap:150:1)
    at Module.<anonymous> (createServer.ts:8:1)
    at ./src/graphql-mock/createServer.ts (createServer.ts:13:1)
    at __webpack_require__ (bootstrap:856:1)
    at fn (bootstrap:150:1)
    at Module.<anonymous> (verticalogo.png:1:1)
    at ./src/index.tsx (index.tsx:18:1)
    at __webpack_require__ (bootstrap:856:1)
    at fn (bootstrap:150:1)
    at 1 (index.ts:21:1)
    at __webpack_require__ (bootstrap:856:1)
    at checkDeferredModules (bootstrap:45:1)
    at Array.webpackJsonpCallback [as push] (bootstrap:32:1)
    at main.chunk.js:1:87
🩺 1
a
Hey, we’ve been seeing this pop up a lot- I’ll bring it to the team for conversation
a
Is that solved?
a
I think it should be resolved as of the latest version!
c
I've just pulled the latest code, seems like this issue has yet been fixed
a
Hi guys, Any update about this? @astonishing-answer-96712
p
I have met the same problem, both 0.10.5 and 0.11.0 get the same result.
@astonishing-answer-96712
c
I think you guys may need to build the whole thing first. As for me, I opted for using docker instead and it's much easier to work with.