@green-football-43791 what’s ideal or practical way to run things in locally. I may have doing it very long and hard way. 😄 1. Running react app on

3000

port using

yarn start

2. Running docker compose from

docker

dir using

./dev.sh

3. If I change .pdl or graphql files then I run

./gradlew build

4. then run

./nuke.sh

again running

./dev.sh

5. if I change graphql queries in frontent then just restarting react app Does it makes sense to you? or is there any other quicker way to do things? I think I have tried running Play java servers from GMS project on Intellij before

Hi!! I have a question, how can I ingest from the API or from the emitter?

Hello, Trying to understand how to add a glossary. I have installed the datahub-business-glossary plugin installed and I can see the Add Glossary Term button in the UI on the right side of a dataset page. However, I can't see where to ingest/preload and existing glossary or create a custom one. Could you please point me out to the relevant docs - it does not seem to be covered here https://datahubproject.io/docs/generated/ingestion/sources/business-glossary/ . Many thanks!

Was wondering what folks thought about adding synonyms (as well as other types of "related terms" that are not going up or down a level) to the business glossary. Last mention of such things seems to have happened a while ago: https://datahubspace.slack.com/archives/CUMUWQU66/p1635760216153400. The two most important things I'm interested in representing are: 1. "This concept has multiple string representations but they all mean the same thing", and 2. "This is a closely related term that this term neither contains nor inherits, and just putting them in a group together adds an unnecessary level"

I want to ingest a business glossary, so I looked at the docs on how to design the yaml. The link to the example from the docs is broken: https://datahubproject.io/docs/generated/ingestion/sources/business-glossary Is there a new link so I can understand how to design the glossary yaml file?

Hey gang, I may have stumbled upon a potential bug opportunity 🙂 My sample business glossary is properly formatted and looks like this:

version: 1
source: DataHub
owners:
  users:
    - joshua.garza
nodes:
  - name: Classification
    description: A set of terms related to Data Classification
    terms:
      - name: Sensitive
        description: Sensitive Data
        custom_properties:
          is_confidential: false
      - name: Confidential
        description: Confidential Data
        custom_properties:
          is_confidential: true
      - name: HighlyConfidential
        description: Highly Confidential Data
        custom_properties:
          is_confidential: true
  - name: ClientsAndAccounts
    description: Provides basic concepts such as account, account holder, account provider, relationship manager that are commonly used by financial services providers to describe customers and to determine counterparty identities
    owners:
      groups:
        - POWER_USERS
    terms:
      - name: Accounts Payable
        description: Amounts owed to suppliers
        term_source: "INTERNAL"
        source_ref: SHARP
        source_url: "<https://www.sharp.com/>"
        inherits:
          - Classification.HighlyConfidential
        contains:
          - ClientsAndAccounts.ActiveIndicatorFlag
      - name: ActiveIndicatorFlag
        description: This is an internal identifier used in the data warehouse to flag records no longer active in the source system(s). Inactive records are suppressed from Merlin queries.
        term_source: "INTERNAL"
        source_ref: SHARP
        source_url: "<https://www.sharp.com/>"
        inherits:
          - Classification.HighlyConfidential
      - name: AccountsReceivable
        description: Amounts owed
        term_source: "WorkDay"
        source_ref: SHARP
        source_url: "<https://www.sharp.com/>"
        inherits: 
          - Classification.Sensitive
      - name: WriteOff
        description: Amount which will not be collected or associated with revenue stream
        term_source: INTERNAL
        source_ref: SHARP
        source_url: "<https://www.sharp.com/>"
        inherits: 
          - Classification.Confidential
        contains:
          - ClientsAndAccounts.AccountsReceivable
          - ClientsAndAccounts.Accounts Payable

I am able to successfully load it

datahub ingest -c ingest_business_glossary_recipe_complete.yaml

This is my ingestion yaml file

source:
  type: datahub-business-glossary
  config:
    # Coordinates
    file: /home/joshua.garza/.datahub/quickstart/finance_terms_sample.yml

However, when I review the changes in the UI, I don't see the

term_source

values make it in...

Hi @cuddly-butcher-39945! Thanks so much for surfacing this — would you mind opening a GH Issue with this detail so we can get it prioritized?

Also curious - what is the level of severity/urgency to get this resolved?

Hey @little-megabyte-1074, absolutely! It's not a super urgent issue right now, as I am still scripting out all existing terms. Thanks for checking on this. I'll get the issue created real soon.

Hello! Could you please help with a clear understanding of the Business Glossary terms connection? We can connect our terms as "Contains" and "Inherits". For me, this means that if, for example, Term 1 contains Term 2, then Term 2 inherits Term 1. However, when I add a relation in term 1, I don't automatically get a reverse link in term 2. Is it a bug or feature? In the thread, I'll try to give an example. Thank you in advance!

👋 I have a general question about the business glossary. It looks entity association works only up to one level of inheritance. So for glossary terms with an inheritance relation of

g1 -> g2 -> g3

entities associated with g3 will show up for searches of its parent term g2 but won’t show up for searches of its grandparent term g1. Is this the correct view of glossary term inheritance and searchability? I might be misunderstanding how to use inheritance with glossary terms. I also made a quick example inheritance structure in the DataHub demo instance. In the example

lvl3-term

is associated with an entity. That entity shows up in the “Related Entities” tab for

lvl3-term

and its parent

lvl2-term

but not for its grandparent

lvl1-term

.