I just used Writer for the first time today and agree with many of the points you made. Here are some more observations: • I actually think it might be better than Grammarly in terms of editing/proofreading (I like that it catches non-inclusive language/PC things) • the info is mostly surface level and not too helpful, definitely not opinionated or with a unique angle • it also pulled some very specific information on WPBeginners content library (I was seeing what it would generate and compared to this article we wrote on content updates) ie. "At WPBeginner, we have a library of over 2,000 articles. We generally update our older articles on a quarterly basis. For us, it's a combination of things. We have site-wide changes that we want to test (like a new design, ads, or functionality), so we use those as an opportunity to also update a few old articles. " ◦ I have no idea where it got this - I ran it through Copyscape but it didn't match anything. It's like a quote with no source, so while it's helpful and specific in a real article I probably couldn't use it • Overall: I want to try their CoWrite feature where you feed it your best work and it creates content based on that, but seems to be an enterprise feature so you'd have to set up a sales call and can't trial it (@gentle-dress-37057 have you tried this feature?)

editing agency writers and AI basically each have their own problems. right now i'm editing an agency article where the author does not know what "enterprise-grade" means and so the entire article premise is wrong

its a lot of work either way lol