Membership Application Thread :thread: 7/20
# general
l
Membership Application Thread ๐Ÿงต 7/20
Proposal: Since we have the child name + device selection in-app now (which i designed and brough in for freindlies), we COULD ask in-app again and make the beginning part of application feel more like membership application (and not a full info collection of child names + specific devices) Thoughts @royce @oliver
o
Not fully following I don't think
we COULD ask in-app again
Ask what in-app? And is this for known friendlies or people that have come through membership application?
l
We are now asking friendlies to add kids names and devices in iOS, so I'm suggesting we could do it in the second part of application (tell us more about your family) /during iOS onboarding for accepted members as well Coming off note that web membership app felt too engineering requirement coded
o
I see I see
I still think the experience of seeing your family already set-up when you get to the app is a enough of a delighter that we should preserve it by gathering that information before-hand
I think other notes will remove enough of the "information-gathery" screens that it will be ok that the children->devices flow be a bit more structured
l
so collect child names + specific devices per child on application
o
yes
I also think if it was sequenced after some free-response answers "what are your biggest pain points" or similar it will feel like a totally normal part of an application which is the mindset the user is in
l
we save those for after the application is submitted to optimize for top of funnel completions
o
Got it
l
trying to be conscious of the product - eng - marketing - design conflicts of interest
๐Ÿ‘ 1
o
I think it would be good to have 1 free optional free-response even at top of funnel
"anything else you want to tell us" or similar
๐Ÿ‘ 1
Will create buy-in and make it feel more like something they are applying for and want
๐Ÿ‘ 1
l
@oliver for the web form could we in theory do like "Phone" / "Tablet" / "Computer" instead of: "iPhone" / "Android Phone" / "iPad" / "Android Tablet" / "Macbook" / "PC"
or do we need to know OS specifically at this stage
o
We need to know OS at this stage ๐Ÿ˜•
l
When we did plain text onboarding with the agent for the devices how did we handle that?
o
We transitioned from learning ages of the kids
Like "Got it. At those ages are they using iPads or are phones entering the picture?"
And if they said phones we'd ask what kind
Luca do you have a rough ETA on these latest improvements? Would love to have them in for bug bash this afternoon which @Michael Landolfi will need some buffer for
l
finished or a working version? i can stop now
notes came in friday night late for me and have been on plane wifi working on it so its moving a bit slowly
o
No prob - just don't want you spinning on things we won't actually be able to implement for tomorrow
I'd say yes wrap now to the extent possible and we can consider design frozen for tomorrow
l
ok @Michael Landolfi
โœ… 1