Why are they comparing against Lucee 5? :thinking_...
# lucee
z
Why are they comparing against Lucee 5? πŸ€”
e
Because the ColdBox test suite doesn’t run on Lucee 6 due to compatibility bugs.
Lucee 6 does indeed run faster than BoxLang.
πŸ‘ 2
πŸ‘ 1
(For now. 😏 )
z
Have those bugs been raised with us? We like fixing bugs when we know about them
b
Hey elpete, I agree with zackster, your visual might be a tad misleading. Keep it fair guys.
☝️ 1
d
We were waiting on Lucee 6.2.1 for some of the Ortus stuff to work. It looks like things are much happier with that release for a lot of the modules. So this failing test with cbswagger, for example, was run in February with 6.1.1.118 but will probably pass now with 6.2.1 without any changes to cbswagger (it works for us, at least). Not sure if those tests can be manually kicked off again to check against the latest versions? https://github.com/coldbox-modules/cbSwagger/actions/runs/13356745951/job/37300567239ColdBox Coldbox seems to be ok on 6.2.0 now also. https://github.com/ColdBox/coldbox-platform/actions/runs/14742191475/job/41382549376
z
So I ran the test suite myself yesterday, at the moment BoxLang is failing, Lucee 6 is now passing and Lucee 6 is the fastest by 60s
πŸ‘πŸ» 1
πŸ‘ 2
fun fact the 6 regression was a fucking extra semi colon! sigh
d
Nice! Good to hear. We’ve been bumping a bunch of our apps to 6.2.1 this past week from 5.4.x with great success.
πŸŽ‰ 1
z
Cool, I really love hearing success stories
b
Same here zackster, our app is running 6.2.1.122. So far, it works very well.
πŸŽ‰ 1
Oh and further, we are using your light-nginx docker image. That has been awesome to work with.
z
Could you both drop a comment on this post, it helps encourage others to upgrade hearing success stories https://dev.lucee.org/t/wed-love-to-hear-some-feedback-about-6-2-1/15089
πŸ‘ 1