Scott Steinbeck
09/14/2022, 6:21 PMrunAsync
the correct solution? i basically want to fire off a SQL task that runs when a user makes a change, but they dont need to wait around for it to finishbdw429s
09/14/2022, 6:23 PMfire and forget tasks, that i want to make sure get completedIsn't that an oxymoron?
bdw429s
09/14/2022, 6:23 PMScott Steinbeck
09/14/2022, 6:23 PMScott Steinbeck
09/14/2022, 6:23 PMScott Steinbeck
09/14/2022, 6:25 PMbdw429s
09/14/2022, 6:27 PMScott Steinbeck
09/14/2022, 6:28 PMbdw429s
09/14/2022, 6:31 PMbdw429s
09/14/2022, 6:31 PMScott Steinbeck
09/14/2022, 6:31 PMbdw429s
09/14/2022, 6:32 PMbdw429s
09/14/2022, 6:32 PMScott Steinbeck
09/14/2022, 6:33 PMbdw429s
09/14/2022, 6:33 PMScott Steinbeck
09/14/2022, 6:35 PMbdw429s
09/14/2022, 6:36 PMScott Steinbeck
09/14/2022, 6:37 PMbdw429s
09/14/2022, 8:14 PMScott Steinbeck
09/14/2022, 8:59 PMbdw429s
09/15/2022, 3:55 PMbdw429s
09/15/2022, 3:56 PMisRunning:true
somewhere, you may sit around waiting forever if the actual process diedScott Steinbeck
09/15/2022, 3:59 PM