So in all, what am I benefitting from using
cal.com pro over
calendly.com pro? Because it seems for the obvious reasons I'd use a scheduling infra is to have the 1 and 2.. All that is free is UI with CRUD functionality on appointment timings and some plugins.. So I have no choice but to go with pro. And if I HAVE to pay, why should I not go with something like Calendly that asks for same amount of money and gives tonne of stuff in return?
The way I see it is
calendly.com is way more mature, has better support (my mails from 1-2 days ago to
cal.com haven't been replied to whereas Calendly always does before I even expect. that's why I had to come to slack), It has way more integrations and time tested codebase. I can even send WhatsApp messages and what not. They have apps for every platform, their integrations require much lesser steps.. etc etc etc.
For me atleast, the biggest selling point for
cal.com was it being "open source", that's how I see it being marketed everywhere, but the entire code base Is not public, so is it really open source? Who calls their software open-source and does this? What do I do with the codebase when most of the things I need from
cal.com are monitized? RedwoodJS is open source. Discourse is open source. Forem is open source.
cal.com is certainly not in the same realm.
Open source, "for absolutely anyone", all this marketing got me really excited for
cal.com.
What I had expected was,
cal.com providing entire software as opensource atleast to self host, and premium for when someone want's to use
cal.com 's servers. A business model that Discourse and Forem uses and those are pretty big and complex softwares.
in
app.cal.com I can't even create two event types without purchasing premium? Does it really add to
cal.com costs so much to allow that? like one additional event type? Seems petty business model to me. Just an example. I don't understand the business model of this app.
A lot of people who recommended me
cal.com over twitter and other social have the wrong idea of what's actually open sourced by
cal.com and the business model you guys are using, they have incorrect knowledge of what can and can't be done with the code available over github.
Lastly, your github says open source. Not open core. Lies.