Hey everyone! My name is Miguel Serna (MFS-code on gh) and I'm looking at making the BAML plugin for Neovim. I recently read the blog post https://boundaryml.com/blog/ai-agents-need-new-syntax which mentions Neovim support is coming soon, but I can't find any work started on it (besides an existing community plugin that's syntax-only). Since baml-cli lsp already works over stdio, all the hard pieces seem to be in place. I also found two small bugs in the LSP server I'd be happy to PR, code_action_provider is set to None despite having an implementation, and will_save is advertised but unhandled. Am I good to start work on this or is there anything I should consider before digging in?

i don’t think there’s anything stopping you, but just be warned we are working on a new compiler with a new lsp in

/baml_language

it has some stuff the existing one doesn’t like semantic tokens and inlay hints

@Serna i may recommend working on purely neovim support of the

baml_language

toolchain fyi instead of

engine

as @avery (BAML) recommended 🙂

Thanks Vaibhav! Yeah, I've been going through baml_language/ and the bex_project LSP with semantic tokens, inlay hints, code lenses, etc.

aweomse. just ping on this thread, and i'm sure either me or @avery (BAML) would be happy to hop on!

it is a bit broken rn in some places (inlay hints on client blocks notably), and might get changed somewhat. don’t think that should affect an LSP plugin tho