Thread automatically created by YorSant#83 in #1141725718364045394

Thread automatically created by YorSant#83 in #1141725718364045394

Thread automatically created by Dorian.Lupu in #1141725718364045394

Hi guys, I'm having the following issue. It sounds like a bug to me.

ruby
field(:name, as: :text, name: 'Full Name', link_to_record: true, filterable: true, sortable: true)
field(
  :email,
  as: :text,
  protocol: :mailto,
  filterable: true,
  sortable: true,
  visible: lambda {
    current_user.management? || current_user.board_member? || current_user == resource.record.user
  }
)
field(
  :phone,
  as: :text,
  protocol: :tel,
  filterable: true,
  sortable: true,
  visible: lambda {
    current_user.management? || current_user.board_member? || current_user == resource.record.user
  }
)
field(
  :tags,
  as: :tags,
  filterable: true,
  sortable: true,
  help: 'Press comma to enter more than one tag. Tags with multiple words are allowed.'
)

The table is broken with the above fields; please look at the image. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1141725718364045394/1232902291657461871/Screenshot_2024-04-24_at_11.49.09_PM.png?ex=662b253c&is=6629d3bc&hm=aed39532b412e0fb47926f7edf0fa7f523e1712974f450d5d51ddb1f00faa6c6&

hi guys - on a tag-field. is it possible enfore suggestions via

enfore_suggestions: true

without pre-filling them when creating a new record? i have a lot of options to choose from but the user should only select a few. with the current setup, the user has to delete all of the suggestions first before he can select the tags wanted. thats my field:

ruby
field :disciplines,
          as: :tags,
          delimiters: [","],
          suggestions: -> { record&.disciplines&.present? ? record&.disciplines : [] },
          enforce_suggestions: true

is there a way to pass instance specific options to a field? specifically, I'd like to conditionally pass the correct

geometry

argument to the

area

field type based on whether the geojson is multipolygon or polygon. It appears that field specific options are static...

Is there a way to get an audio file field to show the media player on index view? My field looks like:

field :soundtrack1, as: :file, is_image: false, display_filename: false

During edit, trix fields lose captions on image attachments. Add an attachment to a trix field, enter a caption, and then save. Then edit the record. The caption is rendered as part of the text. If you save the record, the text is saved as part of the text body, not the caption. Anybody else see that? I can add a github issue, but I wanted to check first to see if anybody knows a workaround.

Hello. Are there any updates on the money field documentation? I'm trying it, but I haven't made it work. (I may be doing something wrong)

Is there an easy way to add a dropdown with a few icons? I'm adding categories with a name, icon, and color. Something like:

ruby
def fields
  field(:name, as: :text)
  field(:icon, as: :select, options: -> { helpers.icons_for_select })
  field(:color, as: :text) # color picker???
end

I wonder if there is a way to use

icon: "heroicons/outline/eye"

with a list of icons, as Avo does in a few places (maybe color too). Has anyone tried it before? Thanks in advance.

I'm working on building an action where I want to have a field where I can select a model. I've only been able to use a select field so far, but this isn't practical for models that have a lot of records. Is it possible to use something like

has_one

or a

belongs_to

field for something like this?

Hi, I have a field that is disabled by default. On change of a select filed I wish to enable it and about 4 other fields. I'm struggling to get this to work. I'd like to use the disable pre made action of resource-edit but unsure how to use those from another controller.

import { Controller } from '@hotwired/stimulus'

export default class extends Controller {
  static values = {
    view: String,
  }

  static targets = ["typeSelectInput", "marriagedateDateWrapper", "marriagedateDateInput"];

  async connect() {
    console.log('view ->', this.viewValue)
  }

  typeChanged() {
    console.log('type was changed');

    let value = this.typeSelectInputTarget.value;

    if (value == "Spouse") {
        console.log('Selected SPOUSE');

        this.marriagedateDateInputTarget. // Activate field here
    }
  }
}

Why title field form hidden only on Chrome browser Avo version: 3.10.0 https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1141725718364045394/1257978859320508486/image.png?ex=66865f9c&is=66850e1c&hm=fd94a994d493411a2b01d113588049f1fd5250ffa8a41502af0a467edea151e6&

Is there a way to access the selected resource_ids within the fields of an action? I'm wanting to show a select that is filtered based on what the user has checked on an index action. On the show action it works great I can use a belongs_to with an attached scope which gives me access to the parent record to filter the dropdown. I've been trying for hours to find a way but I've had no luck, thank you!

I have a field which is a reference to another resource with

:belongs_to

, but I'd like to display a field that is more meaningful than the object id (namely the

:description

field of the associated resource)

Is there a way to make this external_image field link to a resource path? field :photo, as: :external_image, name: "Main Photo" do record.photo.url end

When using

attach_fields

, is there anything special I need to add to my model or controller somewhere? I have the following "Company" field:

tab "Companies" do
                field :companies, as: :has_many, through: :coaster_companyables,
                    attach_scope: -> { query.order(name: :asc) },
                    searchable: true,
                    show_on: :edit,
                    linkable: true,
                    attach_fields: -> {
                        field :role, as: :text
                    }
                # field :companyables, as: :has_many
            end

And when i try to attach a company and type a Role in, I just get Avo stating "Failed to attach Company". No errors in the log, just this line:

rocessing by Avo::AssociationsController#create as TURBO_STREAM
20:58:39 web.1    |   Parameters: {"authenticity_token"=>"[FILTERED]", "fields"=>{"related_id"=>"intamin-amusements", "role"=>"trains"}, "button"=>"", "view"=>"show", "resource_name"=>"attractions", "id"=>"this-one-at-this-place", "related_name"=>"companies"}

Just wondered if i'm missing something before I spin up a demo app.

Hey all. So it looks like on an edit form with a belongs_to, the select box of possible associations can be massive if there is a huge number of possible records that can be associatied (I guess just showing all possible records of the given type?). Is there a lazily loaded/search powered alternative?

Hi all, This is more of a "Is there an option I haven't thought of approach" type of question: Ok, So I have a Company model which is connected to my Attraction and Venue models via a polymorphic has_many : through association. The join model is called Companyable and is used to store the Role that a Company had in a particular Attraction or Venue. This is all great and works in Avo amazingly! Ok, here's where i'm unsure what approach to take. On the Attraction side, I wish to store the Model and SubModel of each one. Models and SubModels are only necessary for SOME companies NOT all. Some Attractions I only have a Model and no SubModel. I'm thinking that I can keep my current associations as they are, but create new Rails Models for Model and SubModel. Then on my edit page I can use the Avo Stimulus functionality to be able to choose a Company, Then a Model, and then a SubModel. In this case I need to find out how to only submit the deepest select box value (eg, don;t submit SubModel if no SubModel was chosen). This sounds like it should work fine, BUT we COULD get to a scenario where an Attraction has a Model and SubModel selected for a Company that isn't associated. This obviously does not make any sense. Ideally i'd like to be able to have the dependent selects ONLY show Companies in the first of the three selects (Companies, Models, SubModels), that have been associated. This is fine if the Model/SubModels are being associated after the Attraction exists, but if i'm creating a new Attraction, due to not being able to attach the Company at creation time, I can't do this. One thing I COULD do is to have some sort of check on the Index view that highlights or tags all records where the Model/SubModel Company does not match one of the regular attached Companies and then i can fix it. I'm trying to build this with Avo in mind. Just happy to hear some other people's thoughts on approaches I could take.

Hello, Just a follow on question to the above. I pretty much have come up with a solution to the above, just now trying to implement a decent UI. What I want is a set of 3 dependent Select boxes. Company => Model => Submodel. I've been tearing my hair out trying to get an example of this working by following the example in this guide: https://docs.avohq.io/3.0/stimulus-integration.html#custom-stimulus-controllers That's great and all but due to some differences in what i'm aiming for i'm really struggling. My associations look like: Companyable: belongs_to :company belongs_to :companyable, polymorphic: true belongs_to :model, optional: true belongs_to :submodel, optional: true Company: has_many :companyables has_many :models Model: belongs_to :company has_many :submodels Submodel: belongs_to :model My Company field on the Companyable Resource looks like: field :company, as: :belongs_to, html: { edit: { input: { data: { companyable_resource_target: "companyFieldInput", # Make the input a target action: "input->companyable-resource#onCompanyChange" # Add an action on change } } } } The Model field on the Companyable Resource looks like: field :model, as: :belongs_to, html: { edit: { input: { data: { companyable_resource_target: "modelFieldInput" # Make the input a target } } } } Just wondering if someone had an example where the fields were

belongs_to

and not `select`s. I'd appreciate a bit of help with getting this up and running and i've been scrabbling for days on this. Sigh

Are fields with a

:has_one

relationship suppose to trigger scope? In the documentation has_many relationships are not suppose to trigger a scope through association, only index. https://docs.avohq.io/3.0/authorization.html#associations shouldn't the behavior be the same for has_one? https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1141725718364045394/1293156682368553021/image.png?ex=67065982&is=67050802&hm=d5a4c19377850d3d5062d60621351eb65357d62470933929e67ef0029a10374e&

Hey everyone, is there a way to filter out specific values to display in the belongs_to select? I would like to display fields of study that are related to selected macro major and not all of them also ideally have field of study greyed out until macro major is selected

class Avo::Resources::Listing < Avo::BaseResource
  # self.includes = []
  # self.attachments = []
  self.search = {
    query: -> { query.ransack(name_cont: params[:q], description_cont: params[:q], m: "or").result(distinct: false) }
  }
  self.title = :description

  def fields
    field :id, as: :id
    field :name, as: :text
    field :occ_macro_major, as: :belongs_to, searchable: true
    field :occ_field_of_study, as: :belongs_to, searchable: true
  end
end

class OccMacroMajor < ApplicationRecord
  has_many :occ_field_of_studies, inverse_of: :occ_macro_major, dependent: :destroy
  has_many :listings, inverse_of: :occ_macro_major
end

class OccFieldOfStudy < ApplicationRecord
  belongs_to :occ_macro_major, inverse_of: :occ_field_of_studies
  has_many :listings, inverse_of: :occ_field_of_study
end

Any way to use tags that have commas in them?

https://docs.avohq.io/3.0/stimulus-integration.html#pre-made-stimulus-methods is there a way to toggle visibility depending on field value (true or false) instead of on click event? in the provided example it does not matter what value is when editing the resource, visibility is updated on checkbox click

Thread automatically created by John Ngo in #1141725718364045394

Thread automatically created by John Ngo in #1141725718364045394

Hello Guys, anyone having trouble to setup default value in fields?

def fields
    field :id, as: :id
    field :name, as: :text, name: "Nome", required: true
    field :email, as: :text, required: true
    field :password, as: :password, only: [:new, :edit]
    field :role, as: :select, enum: ::User.roles, name: "Acesso a plataforma", default: "super_admin", readonly: true
  end

I haven't thoroughly investigated yet, but it seems that the limit restriction on has_many may no longer work. avo: 3.17.3 rails: 8.0.1

field :foo, as: :has_many, scope: -> {
      query.limit(3) # limit does not work
    }

has_many :foo, -> { limit 3 }  # limit does not work

Has anybody built a rating field? Like 4 out of 5 stars (or thumbs, moneybags, skulls, etc)?

Hi, I'm trying to pass a list of id's through to an action like so:

action Avo::Actions::MakeMainPhotoFor,
            arguments: -> do
                {
                    attractions: record.attractions.pluck(:id)
                }
            end

but in the fields method I try to output that and I get the id of a record from a totally different class. Any ideas?