Tarun Dhandharia
06/26/2024, 11:20 AMLionel Mena
06/26/2024, 1:53 PM-XX:MaxDirectMemorySize
?Charles Smith
06/27/2024, 8:02 PMTapajit Chandra Paul
07/02/2024, 5:07 AMNoor
07/15/2024, 7:24 AMPaweł Motyka
07/22/2024, 11:19 AMSELECT entity_id, SUM(HLL_SKETCH_ESTIMATE("hll_column")) FROM "test_hll_dataset" GROUP BY 1
But that is quite slow (takes over 20s to calculate);
is there a more Druid-way to make this calculation?Agata Klof
07/29/2024, 7:48 AMNoor
07/29/2024, 3:09 PMVictoria Lim
07/31/2024, 5:22 PMPuneet Arora
08/30/2024, 6:13 AMUtkarsh Chaturvedi
09/03/2024, 6:52 AMRahul Sharma
09/04/2024, 10:24 AMEvan Rusackas
09/19/2024, 4:48 PMMarcos Maia
09/22/2024, 10:52 AMPeter Marshall
09/30/2024, 10:59 AMDivit Bui
10/06/2024, 3:32 PMrishikesh
11/04/2024, 9:54 AMStefanos Pliakos
11/06/2024, 10:55 AMZhenyu Yang
11/19/2024, 12:44 AMUtkarsh Chaturvedi
11/20/2024, 10:34 AMHardik Bajaj
12/03/2024, 12:23 PMUtkarsh Chaturvedi
12/09/2024, 11:34 AMPeter Marshall
12/16/2024, 7:59 AMSeki Inoue
12/18/2024, 2:01 AMdropExisting
for compaction config? Can I hear your experience with this option?
I want to save our S3 cost but I hesitate enabling this because I don't want to loose any data.Noor
01/20/2025, 10:27 AMDavid Adams
02/06/2025, 10:31 PM{"timestamp": "2011-01-12T00:00:00.000Z", "label": "row1", "tags": ["t1","t2","t3"]}
{"timestamp": "2011-01-13T00:00:00.000Z", "label": "row2", "tags": ["t3","t4","t5"]}
{"timestamp": "2011-01-14T00:00:00.000Z", "label": "row3", "tags": ["t5","t6","t7"]}
{"timestamp": "2011-01-14T00:00:00.000Z", "label": "row4", "tags": []}
A query of
SELECT label, tags
FROM "mvd_example_rollup"
WHERE tags = 't3'
GROUP BY 1,2
should return an exploded view of all tags within each MVD that got matched (filter applied pre-explosion):
{"label":"row1","tags":"t1"}
{"label":"row1","tags":"t2"}
{"label":"row1","tags":"t3"}
{"label":"row2","tags":"t3"}
{"label":"row2","tags":"t4"}
{"label":"row2","tags":"t5"}
However, in my V30 instance, the behavior I see is instead returning a result that suggests a post-explosion filter. The results I get returned are effectively as follows:
{"label":"row1","tags":"t3"}
{"label":"row2","tags":"t3"}
Are any gurus able to decipher if this is a simple documentation issue, or is my cluster behaving in an unintended way?Andrea Licata
02/21/2025, 5:43 PMSivakumar Karthikesan
03/26/2025, 6:37 PMDinesh
03/28/2025, 10:45 AMakshat
04/25/2025, 7:02 AM