so yeah. i think i'm agreeing what you said at the...
# dev-frontend
c
so yeah. i think i'm agreeing what you said at the end artem. if
sourceDefinedCursor=true
then we should not show radio buttons for cursor field.
c
it wouldn’t be nice though as an FYI to just show what field is used as cursor by the source (non-editable)?
a
but we can’t show what field is used in the case I send above. As we can’t understand what field is actually used for cursor.
Theoretically we can display radio buttons with disabled state, but we should have correct path then
c
so that case you sent is weird.
the contract is that when
sourceDefinedCursor=true
is that the source doesn't have to tell you what field (or fields) it is using as its cursor.
so the cursor field should just be ignored entirely
when
sourceDefinedCursor=true
but yeah. it's a little sad that we can't tell the user what cursor will be used, even if it is not editable.
😢 1
but with the current contract we can't do that reliably.
👌 1