Gary K
02/18/2026, 6:13 AMDATAPLANE_CLIENT_ID_SECRET_KEY keys in the env-configmap. This is causing our code checks to fail. Is it possible to configure things such that only one DATAPLANE_CLIENT_ID_SECRET_KEY key is put into the env-configmap?kapa.ai
02/18/2026, 6:13 AMDATAPLANE_CLIENT_ID_SECRET_KEY (and DATAPLANE_CLIENT_SECRET_SECRET_KEY) entries are rendered into the airbyte-airbyte-env ConfigMap because two templates both emit the same keys and are included unconditionally. [[Duplicate keys issue](https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/issues/66546)] From the knowledge sources: - airbyte.auth.bootstrap.configVars generates DATAPLANE_CLIENT_ID_SECRET_KEY / DATAPLANE_CLIENT_SECRET_SECRET_KEY. - airbyte.workloadLauncher.dataPlane.configVars also generates those same keys. - env-configmap.yaml includes both templates without conditions, which produces duplicate keys. [[Duplicate keys issue](https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/issues/66546)] The docs/issues do not describe any chart values or configuration flags that let you disable one of these includes or otherwise avoid the duplicate key purely via values.yaml. The suggested fix in the issue is a chart change (adding conditionals in the templates), not a runtime configuration option. [[Duplicate keys issue](https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/issues/66546)] The only workaround mentioned in the sources is to override the named template from a parent chart so it doesn’t emit the duplicate keys: > “if you have a parent chart with airbyte as dependencies, it’s still possible to override the named template in the parent chart so it does not generate the duplicate keys…” [[Duplicate keys issue](https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/issues/66546)] So, based on the available information: - There is no documented way in chart 2.0.x to configure values so that only one DATAPLANE_CLIENT_ID_SECRET_KEY is rendered into the env ConfigMap. - The practical options (per the sources) are: - Override the relevant named template(s) in a parent chart to remove one set of keys, or - Wait for / upgrade to a chart version where the upstream templates have been fixed. If you need, I can outline how a parent chart override would look conceptually, but the exact template code is not provided in the knowledge sources.