Ishan Anilbhai Koradiya
12/18/2025, 7:44 AMkapa.ai
12/18/2025, 7:44 AMApiException: Gone when updating a workload to LAUNCHED is coming from the Workload API returning HTTP 410 (“Gone”) for that workload. From the logs in the proxy/sidecar issue, the same 410 is returned when the sidecar tries to heartbeat a workload that is already in a terminal state, and the server responds: > Client error : 410 Gone {"message":"Heartbeat a workload in a terminal state"} [[Proxy sidecar](https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/issues/56917)] While your exact message is during updateStatusToLaunched, the pattern is similar: the Workload API is rejecting changes/heartbeats for a workload whose lifecycle, from the API’s point of view, has already ended or is otherwise no longer valid. In that case, the launcher logs: > “Failed to update workload status to launched. Workload may be reprocessed on restart.” The knowledge sources don’t give a precise root cause beyond this (for example, whether it’s due to races, restarts, or DB cleanup), but they do indicate: - 4xx errors from the Workload API generally occur when the workload status is no longer in a mutable state (terminal / removed / invalid). [[Proxy sidecar](https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/issues/56917)] - When launcher status updates fail, the platform may retry or reprocess the workload on restart (as your log warns), which can lead to re-execution if not handled. There isn’t a documented, generic fix in the provided sources. They do not describe configuration changes or a patch to avoid the 410 “Gone” in this specific updateStatusToLaunched case, so I can’t safely recommend a concrete remediation beyond: - Be aware that these 410s indicate a mismatch between what the launcher thinks the workload state is and what the Workload API believes. - If this is happening frequently or causing duplicates/hangs, it likely warrants opening or updating a GitHub issue with full launcher + workload-api logs and your platform version, so the Airbyte team can investigate the lifecycle edge case. If you can share your Airbyte version and any surrounding logs (especially from workload-launcher and the workload-api service), that would help correlate with the behaviors seen in the linked issues.Ishan Anilbhai Koradiya
12/18/2025, 7:54 AMkapa.ai
12/18/2025, 7:54 AMkapa.ai
12/18/2025, 7:54 AMUpdate workflow execution operation failed and repeated “Fail to process task … error":"context deadline exceeded" on history/timer/transfer queue processors. [[Temporal context exceeded](https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/issues/59730)] In that (closed) issue, the errors look essentially the same as yours for both user workflows (wf-id like check_…) and Temporal system workflows (temporal-sys-tq-scanner), and manifest as context deadline exceeded when updating workflow execution. [[Temporal context exceeded](https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/issues/59730)] However, the knowledge source does not document: - a confirmed root cause (e.g., specific DB, network, or storage latency issue), or - a prescribed fix or Airbyte/Temporal configuration change. Given that, all I can say confidently from the sources is: - Your logs match the same Temporal server symptoms seen in that EKS issue. - They indicate timeouts in Temporal’s persistence layer when appending history / updating workflow execution, which can cause retries and “Critical attempts processing workflow task” / “Fail to process task” logs. [[Temporal context exceeded](https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/issues/59730)] The sources don’t provide enough information to explain why this is happening in your cluster or how to remediate it. To go further, you’d need to: - Correlate these Temporal errors with your underlying Temporal database / storage and network latency, and - Potentially open a new GitHub issue with full Temporal + Airbyte logs and environment details, referencing that earlier issue for context.