I'm using airbyte CI and applying basic read testing, it's taking too long because it's reading all the data from my response. Is there a way to limit the amount of data I parse?

Yes, there is a way to limit the amount of data you parse during testing. As per the [Github issue](https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/issues/19256) you referenced, you can consider running the acceptance test on a limited amount of records. This can be done by adjusting the test parameters to only fetch a certain number of records from your database. However, please note that this feature might not be available out of the box and you might need to implement it yourself. If you're fetching data from large databases, the streams could be huge and thus make the test run for a long time. Another alternative that was considered is disabling the pagination which caused all the tests to work relatively fast. But this might not be a feasible solution if you're dealing with large amounts of data. Please note that if there's no activity on this issue for 180 days, it might be marked as stale and closed. If this feature is important to you, consider commenting on the issue to keep it open.

@kapa.ai now give me examples of test_two_sequential_reads configuration

The

TestTwoSequentialReads

is a test that verifies that all streams in the input catalog which support incremental sync can do so correctly. It does this by running two read operations and verifying the output. However, the knowledge sources do not provide a specific example of the

TestTwoSequentialReads

configuration. Here is a general description of how it works: 1. The first read operation takes the configured catalog and config provided to this test as input. It then verifies that the sync produced a non-zero number of

RECORD

and

STATE

messages. 2. The second read operation takes the same catalog and config used in the first test, plus the last

STATE

message output by the first read operation as the input state file. It verifies that either no records are produced (since we read all records in the first sync) or all records that produced have cursor value greater or equal to cursor value from

STATE

message. The test is performed only for streams that support incremental. Streams that do not support incremental sync are ignored. If no streams in the input catalog support incremental sync, this test is skipped. The inputs for this test are: - `config_path`: Path to a JSON object representing a valid connector configuration - `configured_catalog_path`: Path to configured catalog - `timeout_seconds`: Test execution timeout in seconds For more details, you can refer to the [Airbyte documentation](https://docs.airbyte.com/connector-development/testing-connectors/connector-acceptance-tests-reference#test-incremental-sync).

@kapa.ai share with me a snippet on this implementation in yml definition

A message from kapa.ai

I'm sorry, but the provided knowledge sources do not contain a YAML snippet or example specifically related to the

TestTwoSequentialReads

implementation. The

TestTwoSequentialReads

is a part of the connector acceptance tests in Airbyte, which are written in Python and are not configured via YAML. However, if you're looking for examples of YAML configurations for Airbyte connectors, here are a few examples from the provided knowledge sources: 1. [Example of a connector definition with incremental sync](https://docs.airbyte.com/connector-development/config-based/tutorial/incremental-reads) 2. [Example of a JWT Authenticator configuration](https://docs.airbyte.com/connector-development/config-based/understanding-the-yaml-file/authentication#jwt-authenticator) 3. [Example of an OAuth Authenticator configuration](https://docs.airbyte.com/connector-development/config-based/understanding-the-yaml-file/authentication#oauth) 4. [Example of a Data Retriever configuration](https://docs.airbyte.com/connector-development/config-based/understanding-the-yaml-file/yaml-overview#data-retriever) Please note that these are general examples and may not directly relate to the

TestTwoSequentialReads

implementation. For more specific examples or guidance, you may want to refer to the [Airbyte documentation](https://docs.airbyte.com/connector-development/testing-connectors/connector-acceptance-tests-reference#test-incremental-sync) or the source code of the connector you're interested in.

@kapa.ai what is the command to execute the airbyte ci test without generating the report

A message from kapa.ai

To execute the

airbyte-ci

test without generating the report, you can use the

--disable-report-auto-open

flag. This flag disables the automatic opening of the report after the test run. Here is an example command:

bash airbyte-ci connectors --name=<name-of-your-connector> --use-remote-secrets=false --disable-report-auto-open test

Replace

<name-of-your-connector>

with the name of your connector. Please note that this command is based on the information provided in the knowledge sources and may need to be adjusted based on your specific setup or requirements. For more details, refer to the [Airbyte documentation](https://docs.airbyte.com/connector-development/testing-connectors/connector-acceptance-tests-reference#option-1-preferred-run-against-the-airbyte-ci-test-suite).

@kapa.ai How to execute airbyte-ci format for a specific connector?

A message from kapa.ai

To execute

airbyte-ci

format for a specific connector, you can use the

--name

flag followed by the name of your connector. Here is an example command:

bash airbyte-ci format fix --name=<name-of-your-connector>

Replace

<name-of-your-connector>

with the name of your connector. Please note that this command is based on the information provided in the knowledge sources and may need to be adjusted based on your specific setup or requirements. For more details, refer to the [Airbyte documentation](https://docs.airbyte.com/contributing-to-airbyte/developing-locally#formatting-code).

@kapa.ai Error: No such option: --name

A message from kapa.ai

I apologize for the confusion. It appears there was a misunderstanding. The

--name

option is not available for the

airbyte-ci format

command based on the provided knowledge sources. The

--name

option is used with the

airbyte-ci connectors test

command to specify a particular connector for testing, as mentioned in the [Airbyte documentation](https://docs.airbyte.com/connector-development/testing-connectors/connector-acceptance-tests-reference#option-1-preferred-run-against-the-airbyte-ci-test-suite). For formatting code, the

airbyte-ci format fix all

command is used to format all the code in your local

airbyte

repository. This command is wrapped in a pre-push hook to prevent pushing code that is not formatted. To install the pre-push hook, you can use the

make tools.pre-commit.setup

command as mentioned in the [Airbyte documentation](https://docs.airbyte.com/contributing-to-airbyte/developing-locally#formatting-code). If you want to format code for a specific connector, you might need to manually navigate to the connector's directory and run the appropriate formatting command based on the language of the connector (e.g.,

black

for Python,

prettier

for JavaScript, etc.). However, this is not explicitly mentioned in the provided knowledge sources.

@kapa.ai Now the test report is not being generate correctly, also there are no logs available

A message from kapa.ai

If the test report is not being generated correctly and there are no logs available, it could be due to a variety of reasons. Here are a few troubleshooting steps based on the provided knowledge sources: 1. Check the test command: Ensure that you're running the correct command to execute the tests. For example, if you're using

airbyte-ci

to run tests for a specific connector, the command should be similar to

airbyte-ci connectors --name=<name-of-your-connector> test

. 2. Check the connector configuration: If the tests are failing prematurely without generating a log, it could be due to an issue with the connector configuration. For instance, one of the knowledge sources mentions a problem where tests failed after exiting early with

q

. The issue was suspected to be due to improper cleanup when exiting early, resulting in caching of corrupted data. In such cases, renaming or removing the

secrets/config.json

enabled the tests to progress further. 3. Check for system issues: In some cases, restarting the system or service can resolve the issue. For example, one of the knowledge sources mentions that restarting the Docker daemon fixed the issue. 4. Check the error messages: If there are any error messages in the console or in the system logs, they can provide clues about what's going wrong. For example, one of the knowledge sources mentions seeing many error logs in the worker pods logs. If none of these steps resolve the issue, it might be helpful to reach out to the Airbyte community or support for further assistance. You can do this by creating a new issue in the [Airbyte GitHub repository](https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/issues) detailing the problem you're facing.