Hello team, I’ve submitted a pull request for the Outlook source (PR). This PR addresses a significant issue in the current source code. Could someone please review it at your earliest convenience? Thank you in advance for your help! 😊

Greetings! I want to ask if it is possible to solve this issue: https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/issues/10378? Currently workload-launcher accepts JOB_KUBE_NODE_SELECTORS (and it's counterparts CHECK_JOB_KUBE_NODE_SELECTORS, DISCOVER_JOB_KUBE_NODE_SELECTORS, JOB_ISOLATED_KUBE_NODE_SELECTORS, JOB_SOURCE_DECLARATIVE_MANIFEST_KUBE_NODE_SELECTORS) , but JOB_KUBE_TOLERATIONS doesn't seem to be used. If there's something I can do to facilitate the problem-solving, please give me a hint. I use a Helm v2 chart to deploy Airbyte version 1.8.0. Thank you 🙌

Hi all! 👋 I'm doing some work on Dagster's Airbyte integration at the moment: https://github.com/dagster-io/dagster/pull/31867 The proposed PR creates a single interface for Airbyte Cloud and self-hosted (

AirbyteWorkspace

and

AirbyteClient

). Chatting to the dagster team in the background, and we're unsure if we should split these classes out into separate ones (

AirbyteCloudWorkspace

for cloud,

AirbyteWorkspace

for self-hosted). It seems like apart from the API base URLs, the Cloud & Self-hosted APIs are identical right now. Does anyone know if the Airbyte team intend to keep the API schemas identical, or should we expect these APIs to diverge? We unfortunately are using the Configuration API for one call to get the data types of stream fields, but we can remove that once the

/streams

api includes that information (I did find two issues marked as "complete", but the API still doesn't supply this info [GitHub Issue 41646] [GitHub Issue 44489]).

Hi Everyone! I'm new to Airbyte community and would love to work on my first open-source contribution. I found & created an issue while going through the contribution doc. It's a minor typo problem, perfect for me to get started and get a hang of the process. Is it okay to publish PR or wait for the issue to be assigned to me?

Hello, a PR that fixes a pretty big bug in the Netsuite Marketplace Connector was closed automatically by a bot due to inactivity. It looks like this was around when the new (Enterprise?) connector was being developed and it wasn't clear if the legacy, Marketplace connector would live on. The last comment by a team member was they'd check on if the legacy connector should continue getting development. Since marketplace connector is still active, can we please get this merged? https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/pull/35620

Hi guys, Wondering if anyone needed a new `sync mode`that is something like a

Full refresh

, but instead of replacing all the existing data in the destination, it replaces only a `lookback-period`and beyond with new data Something like: 1. I load all historical data from a stream 2. Then instead of replacing all the records, it replaces only the records from

lookback_period

(possibly by the _airbyte_extracted_at) and beyond with new data (capturing deletes in the meantime) Has anyone needed something like this?

Good afternoon! I've fixed a behaviour on the TikTok Marketing source where deleted data would not be included on some reports, regardless of an existing

include_deleted

setting. The error being fixed is silent, so the connector is currently outputting unexpected/wrong data for all users. https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/pull/65623

Hi I just attempted to submit a PR to fix some Unicode conversion issues I am having while using the MS-SQL Destination connector and believe it got rejected as it is not linked to an issue. Can anyone guide me towards linking this to an issue please? This is the PR:https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/pull/65631

Could I get a review on PR 64893? All checks are passing and it resolves issue 64895. Thanks!

Hi, could I get a review on: https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/pull/65629? I'd need a maintainer to run Connector CI tests (locally they are passing but here they miss credentials)

Could I please get a review for https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/pull/65631?

Hi, new here, developed a source connector for Blackbaud SKY api. Submitted it for review, but unsure if I’ve got everything right and it’s just time to wait in line, or if I need to address any issues or update anything in order to assist with review process. Can anyone advise? Thank you! https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/pull/66221

Hello, I have a Pull Request that's been open for three weeks now. Tests have run successfully, but no further interaction has been made by anyone. There have been two other releases for the same connector now, and I've updated the metadata to account for it. I've also created an issue hoping to improve the PR visibility. https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/pull/65623/

Seeking support on submitted bug/issue, https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte-python-cdk/issues/766 which is a blocking issue for my requested connector, https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/pull/66221 Thanks!

Hello, I am keen to contribute some secrets for integration tests. Who can I talk to?

Ooof, not a lot of activity in here huh.

It appears to have been months since anyone has replied to anything in here 😮

Hi, I’m interested in contributing to the Google Search Console connector issue #40522 and noticed the previous maintainer left. Could someone guide me who currently maintains connector development or who could review PRs for that issue?

Hi, I have a Pull Request that fixes an issue with the TikTok Marketing connector that's been waiting for updates for a month now. It'd be great to get a review on it: https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/pull/65623

Hey @Henry Mattingly isn't airbyte participating in hacktoberfest this year?

🚨🚨🚨 Hey gang 👋 There's a big issue with a popular Outbrain connector — it doesn't download campaigns past the first page (25 max) due to broken pagination. It's a show stopper for marketing dashboards at a company I work with. 💣 I've prepared a fix: https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/pull/67079 Could someone give me a hand with a review? Happy to jump on a slack call to 🚢 it asap. Thank you 🙏

Hello, I've created my first contribution - https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/pull/67112 This is a new connector needed in my project. It is fully working, but I'm sure there will be some things to correct 🙂 Currently "Container Tests" are failing and I'm not sure why. Can someone take a look and review my PR?

What's the timeframe for getting a source contribution reviewed? (https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/pull/67023) Tests completed and passed, ready to go...but is it likely to be 1 week, a month, many months? I want to resist switching to the local forked build but business needs for the new stream will only get louder

Do I need to create a PR for the issue? https://airbytehq.slack.com/archives/C054V9JFTC6/p1758147130723409 ...

I have recently opened a PR to introduce a new source connector for chift. Here is the link to the PR - https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte/pull/67707 Question: How can I apply format checks? The commands I used for that no longer seem to exist :

airbyte-ci connectors --name=source-chift check

airbyte-ci connectors --name=source-chift format

Hello everyone I have an issue to create a destination and source connectors for BigGeo. I have a branch that implements these but according to comuunity guidelines I should not create a PR that is linked to an issue that has the label

needs-triage

. I wanted to ask what the process is to get this label removed.

Good morning! Currently, there are 16 issues on this board that are "Waiting Eng Team", but none, since last week at least, that are on status "Eng Team: In Review". It seems community pull requests are not being worked on at the moment. Filtering by the current sprint, nothing at all shows up. Is there any strategy the development team is currently undergoing that the community should know about? Even if there is no timeline, it'd be great to have more transparency.

Good Day everyone. I have a PR that has been open for about 2 weeks now. I was wondering how long it usually takes to get a review

@Fungai can be a bit unpredictable

I've had to bump the version twice since my PR has been opened