thank you

Not that I can remember. There are times when you may kill multiple boss enemies resulting in all of the enemies being killed and this is handled differently, but if a single enemy dies it is removed. Reactions are performed by the surviving enemies

Sorry, making sure I get this right, since it's really important to our team comp: If 6 locations were at 1 hp, and you hit it with flame wave it would still deal 5 reactions and then immediately die?

Sorry, I meant hit dice not side. If the rule above applies in all cases, then it may do a reaction if more than one location’s hit dice got removed, no?

Incineration Wave only hits each unique enemy once. In your example, it could break 1 of the 6 locations, but not all 6.

even though it's not an AOE? I thought cones hit multiple locations. Now I feel like we've been playing this all wrong lol

It depends on the scenario, but in most situations, if it dies then a reaction is triggered but it isn't alive to do it. Only the enemies left on the board will carry out the reactions. This specification only matters for multi-boss fights.

Skyflight's question was a bit generic, so I had to presume he is referring to a multi-boss encounter where this type of question typically comes up

lol, sounds like you have. Most AoE's do NOT hit multiple locations. The ones that do will specifically tell you that they can damage multiple HP dice. When you hit multiple locations with an AoE you add +Damage for each location beyond the first.

Sorry, yes I knew that. I was under the impression that incineration wave was not, and I was sure that I read in the rules that cone attacks hit all locations. Though I don't have the rules in front of me... I have been doing that correctly with the AOE attacks at least.

Cone Attacks are a type of AoE attack that are not affected by LoS. Other than that, they function like a normal AoE.

Alright. Thanks!

I appreciate the updates

The Blade's ability Mule's regard allows an interrupt that forces an enemy to redraw any 2 cards (3 if in bull).

Question: can you force a redraw of less than 2 if you wanted?

Or, are you stuck with redrawing the amount stated on the card?

It doesn't say up to 2 cards, hence my question.

I’d rule that you can redraw fewer cards, personally, even if ability as written you’d need to redraw exactly that many.

I’m not sure if you can use one of those redraws on a card you redraw.

If there is only one card I’m wondering about the specific situation. Soo far we wanted to do that too reduce attacks causing a lot of damage due to high draws

We played that as upto 2. Not exactly 2. I think thats the intent. I dont think you can redraw a redraw with how it is written.

Thanks for the thoughts. The ANY two would lead me to think that I could redraw a redraw.

But Peter has a good point. If in Ox mode, you redraw 3 cards, if the enemy had only 1 or 2 draws, forcing 3 redraws seems odd. You could potentially be forced to redraw a good low number or blank.

So, I think I will treat this as up to instead of at. I agree with Tyreal about the intent. It would be very strange to play an interrupt to mess up an enemy and then be forced into potentially making things worse.

Would make the Oathsworn look very stupid

If Swoop or Flight of Feathers fails to do damage and it does have 2 blanks can I use the determination rule or not?

Determination Rule is for attacks only. Abilities that have effects where you're drawing cards to hit a certain number or blanks are not attacks since they do flat damage and bypass the enemy armor.

Aren’t those two attacks that cannot miss?

I just got in doubt when redraw tokens are allowed to be used In rule book apoendix it first says "after drawing might cards" but then later "after attack or checks". How does that affect cards effect that are neither of this.

Would love to have the Oathsworn rules built into a Rulepop, as Isofarian Guard or Sleeping Gods. Such an improvement in quality of life over PDF.