Does anyone know if there is a good way to test storage implementation locally? Currently to test that everything is working proper I have to use a separate hosted project to make sure the files are being uploaded correctly. I know its in a beta but just curious. I run everything else out of the docker container.

The latest blog post mentions this https://supabase.io/blog/2021/07/27/storage-beta#using-storage-in-local-development

Thanks @User I will take a look at this!

I haven't tried this myself yet (it was just released last week) but when I do, I'll see what I can do about getting the docs updated.

Awesome thanks @User and if @User chimes in I would be more then happy to set this up locally and help provide feedback.

It's pretty cool to see how awesome this storage implementation is. Having it tied to records in PostgreSQL with the same security (RLS) implementation, and now with local dev options -- it's come together really fast. It's really well designed, IMHO.

Yeah I agree! On my current project I had been putting off doing image uploads. It's a Jamstack app. Using the currrent storage implementation I was able to get image uploads working in few hours. That was my only complaint was I would have to stop using my local env variables and start use a hosted database instance to see if it was working as expected and if I was handling errors properly. The dev experience has been improving at an insanely fast rate!

Hey Kris, yup the local setup should have storage now. You have two options for storing the objects - s3 and for that you will need to add in the config variables for the s3 bucket here and set the storage backend to s3 https://github.com/supabase/supabase/blob/c142ea71e7a21603d056d99a314579d2fe4f47b6/docker/docker-compose.yml#L99-L101

Thanks for the response @User

oh i think a few more changes are not in the latest release..pushing out a new version in a bit cc @User

Awesome thanks guys I will check it out in a bit when next version drops

Newest version should have it now @User