interesting thing i noticed today, i think i prefer not using conventional commits. i've always used them as it made sense, but i genuinely like the simplicity and readability of committing like: [scope] description of change it looks nice in the gitlog, because the scope is always lined up, whereas the difference in character length w

feat

fix

etc unaligns the scope in other cases. also it should be easy to generate a changelog from this. however this does nothing in terms of the semantic versioning, which is a bit of a tradeoff. i was also always annoyed by the usage of two redundant verbs, like

chore: fix up the blah

, like is it a chore or a fix. anyways. thats my rant