# dotnet-htmx
- r
ripe-action-67367
05/20/2023, 6:57 AMDang, you are right - r
ripe-action-67367
05/20/2023, 6:57 AMI always forget - r
ripe-action-67367
05/20/2023, 6:57 AMRazor pages handler does not allow to have non post/get handlers - r
ripe-action-67367
05/20/2023, 6:57 AMyou can't use delete with them - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 6:57 AMThe problems might be the requirement for a form tag, so that the __RequestVerificationToken can be passed. - r
ripe-action-67367
05/20/2023, 6:58 AMI faced the same in the past - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 6:58 AMDamned annoying! - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 6:58 AMDo you remember what you did to resolve them? And thanks for the help so far. - r
ripe-action-67367
05/20/2023, 6:58 AMYes - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 6:59 AMI swear in the future I'm going to find myself another .NET framework to use! - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 7:00 AMThis stuff should be simple and straight-forward, but it never damn well is! - r
ripe-action-67367
05/20/2023, 7:00 AMrename your method to OnPostDelete and dohx-post="@Url.Page("PageName", "Delete", new {id="asdlfk"})" - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 7:00 AMGiving it a whack... - r
ripe-action-67367
05/20/2023, 7:01 AMFor some reason MS decided that only allowing OnGet and OnPost is a good idea, as if corresponding browsers' restriction is the right way to do this - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 7:03 AMI know! I wish Microsoft would stop treating us like we're all children and just give us a fully usable framework that doesn't have arbitrary limitations dreamed up by some idiotic twat! - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 7:06 AM - r
ripe-action-67367
05/20/2023, 7:06 AMyep - r
ripe-action-67367
05/20/2023, 7:06 AMthat's named handlers for ya - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 7:06 AMSo I get the point of the Delete now where it targets the particular handler. - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 7:06 AMHowever I'm still being 400'd - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 7:07 AMI should have used Python! - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 7:08 AMOr maybe F# with Falco or Clojure, or anything that is not ASP.NET! - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 7:21 AMI've just discovered that Falco has native HTMX support now! - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 7:22 AMI wonder how long it would take t rewrite the billion pages of stuff I have now in F#? - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 7:25 AMOK. Not quite native, https://github.com/dpraimeyuu/Falco.Htmx - r
ripe-action-67367
05/20/2023, 7:27 AMNice - r
ripe-action-67367
05/20/2023, 7:27 AMGotta check Falco out then - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 7:28 AMI've been admiring it from afar for about as long as Pim has published it, but I've yet to get around to be able to use it for anything. - e
elegant-raincoat-69176
05/20/2023, 8:26 AMHey Renerick, I found a solution. Point at a controller rather than a page and just return blank, ala the HTMX example. It's not "entirely truthful" i.e. if something goes wrong, but it will do for now. - l
late-king-98305
05/26/2023, 2:42 AMIf anyone pops in here looking for help with Giraffe.Htmx - be sure to @ me. I'm going to be traveling until mid-June, and probably won't be keeping up with Discord channels. I should be on from time to time, though, so the @s will help me find it when I am on. 🙂 Have fun!